iBeLink BM-S1 vs Goldshell SC6 SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-S1 | Specification | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 6.8 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 17.0 TH/s |
| 2,350 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 345.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 194.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9.0 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 8,018 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-S1
Goldshell SC6 SE
Based on BTC price of $73,537 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell SC6 SE, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 150% more hashrate (6.8 vs 17.0 TH/s). The iBeLink BM-S1 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-S1 and Goldshell SC6 SE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell SC6 SE 150% more hashrate (6.8 vs 17.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-S1 29% better power draw (2,350 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 44% better efficacité (346 vs 194 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-S1 22% better weight (9.0 vs 11.5 kg)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 40% more heat output (8,018 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-S1 18% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-S1 | Metric | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| $768 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,029 |
| -$5.41 | Daily net profit | -$7.35 |
| -$2,744 | Net after 1 year | -$3,713 |
| -$4,720 | Net after 2 years | -$6,398 |
| -$6,696 | Net after 3 years | -$9,082 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-S1Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC6 SE194.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-S1 or Goldshell SC6 SE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-S1 is more profitable at $-5.41/day compared to $-7.35/day for the Goldshell SC6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-S1 or Goldshell SC6 SE?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-S1 or the Goldshell SC6 SE?
The iBeLink BM-S1 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-S1 and Goldshell SC6 SE on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-S1 runs at 345.6 J/TH while the Goldshell SC6 SE runs at 194.1 J/TH — a difference of 151.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 44% better efficacité (346 vs 194 J/TH).