Goldshell E-DG1M vs Goldshell LT5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell E-DG1M | Specification | Goldshell LT5 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.1 GH/s |
| 1,800 W | Consommation électrique | 2,080 W |
| 529,411.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,014,634.2 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 8.5 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,097 BTU/hr |
| 56/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell E-DG1M
Goldshell LT5
Based on BTC price of $73,464 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell E-DG1M l'emporte sur 6 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 48% better efficacité (529,412 vs 1,014,634 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell E-DG1M and Goldshell LT5 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell E-DG1M 66% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 13% better power draw (1,800 vs 2,080 W)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 48% better efficacité (529,412 vs 1,014,634 J/TH)
- Goldshell LT5 47% better weight (16.0 vs 8.5 kg)
- Goldshell LT5 16% more heat output (6,142 vs 7,097 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 115% more score de minage domestique (56.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell E-DG1M | Metric | Goldshell LT5 |
|---|---|---|
| $799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,364 |
| -$4.32 | Daily net profit | -$4.99 |
| -$2,376 | Net after 1 year | -$10,186 |
| -$3,953 | Net after 2 years | -$12,008 |
| -$5,529 | Net after 3 years | -$13,830 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-DG1MScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-DG1M529,411.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell E-DG1M vs Goldshell LT5: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-DG1M is more profitable at $-4.32/day compared to $-4.99/day for the Goldshell LT5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell E-DG1M or the Goldshell LT5 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell E-DG1M is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell LT5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell E-DG1M or Goldshell LT5?
The Goldshell E-DG1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell LT5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell E-DG1M vs Goldshell LT5: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell E-DG1M runs at 529,411.8 J/TH while the Goldshell LT5 runs at 1,014,634.2 J/TH — a difference of 485,222.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 48% better efficacité (529,412 vs 1,014,634 J/TH).