Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Goldshell KD-BOX Pro

Goldshell KD-BOX Pro

Taux de hachage 2.6 TH/s Puissance 75 W Efficiency 28.9 J/TH
VS
IceRiver KS0

IceRiver KS0

Taux de hachage 100.0 GH/s Puissance 65 W Efficiency 650.0 J/TH

Goldshell KD-BOX Pro vs IceRiver KS0

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell KD-BOX Pro Specification IceRiver KS0
2.6 TH/s Taux de hachage 100.0 GH/s
75 W Consommation électrique 65 W
28.9 J/TH Efficiency 650.0 J/TH
35 dB Niveau de bruit 35 dB
1.1 kg Weight 2.5 kg
256 BTU/hr BTU Output 222 BTU/hr
71/100 Home Mining Score 71/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithme KHeavyHash
Goldshell Manufacturer IceRiver

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell KD-BOX Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00000118 BTC $0.08
Daily Electricity -$0.18
Daily Profit -$0.10
Monthly -$3.15
Yearly -$38.28

IceRiver KS0

Daily Revenue 0.00000005 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.16
Daily Profit -$0.15
Monthly -$4.59
Yearly -$55.89

Based on BTC price of $63,875 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 2500% more hashrate (2.6 vs 0.1 TH/s) in the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro's favour. The IceRiver KS0 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell KD-BOX Pro — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro and IceRiver KS0 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 2500% more hashrate (2.6 vs 0.1 TH/s)
  • IceRiver KS0 13% better power draw (75.0 vs 65.0 W)
  • Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 96% better efficacité (28.9 vs 650.0 J/TH)
  • Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 56% better weight (1.1 vs 2.5 kg)
  • Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 15% more heat output (256 vs 222 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell KD-BOX Pro Metric IceRiver KS0
$699 Upfront cost (MSRP) $99
-$0.10 Daily net profit -$0.15
-$737 Net after 1 year -$155
-$776 Net after 2 years -$211
-$814 Net after 3 years -$267
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell KD-BOX Pro

28.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro or the IceRiver KS0?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is more profitable at $-0.10/day compared to $-0.15/day for the IceRiver KS0. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro or IceRiver KS0?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro or IceRiver KS0?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell KD-BOX Pro and IceRiver KS0?

The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro runs at 28.9 J/TH while the IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 621.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 96% better efficacité (28.9 vs 650.0 J/TH).