Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Goldshell HS-BOX

Goldshell HS-BOX

Taux de hachage 235.0 GH/s Puissance 230 W Efficiency 978.7 J/TH
VS
Goldshell HS6 SE

Goldshell HS6 SE

Taux de hachage 3.7 TH/s Puissance 3,400 W Efficiency 918.9 J/TH

Goldshell HS-BOX vs Goldshell HS6 SE

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell HS-BOX Specification Goldshell HS6 SE
235.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 3.7 TH/s
230 W Consommation électrique 3,400 W
978.7 J/TH Efficiency 918.9 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
Weight
785 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,601 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Blake2b+sha3 Algorithme Blake2b+sha3
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell HS-BOX

Daily Revenue 0.00000011 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$0.55
Daily Profit -$0.55
Monthly -$16.36
Yearly -$199.05

Goldshell HS6 SE

Daily Revenue 0.00000167 BTC $0.10
Daily Electricity -$8.16
Daily Profit -$8.06
Monthly -$241.66
Yearly -$2,940.20

Based on BTC price of $62,527 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell HS6 SE comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 1474% more hashrate (0.2 vs 3.7 TH/s) in the Goldshell HS6 SE's favour. The Goldshell HS-BOX claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Goldshell HS6 SE — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell HS-BOX and Goldshell HS6 SE sit on each measurable spec:

  • Goldshell HS6 SE 1474% more hashrate (0.2 vs 3.7 TH/s)
  • Goldshell HS-BOX 93% better power draw (230 vs 3,400 W)
  • Goldshell HS6 SE 6% better efficacité (979 vs 919 J/TH)
  • Goldshell HS6 SE 1378% more heat output (785 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell HS-BOX 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell HS-BOX Metric Goldshell HS6 SE
$99 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,060
-$0.55 Daily net profit -$8.06
-$298 Net after 1 year -$4,000
-$497 Net after 2 years -$6,940
-$696 Net after 3 years -$9,881
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell HS-BOX

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell HS6 SE

918.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Goldshell HS-BOX or the Goldshell HS6 SE?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS-BOX is more profitable at $-0.55/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Goldshell HS6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Goldshell HS-BOX or Goldshell HS6 SE?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell HS-BOX or Goldshell HS6 SE?

The Goldshell HS-BOX scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Goldshell HS-BOX and Goldshell HS6 SE on J/TH?

The Goldshell HS-BOX runs at 978.7 J/TH while the Goldshell HS6 SE runs at 918.9 J/TH — a difference of 59.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 6% better efficacité (979 vs 919 J/TH).