Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)

Taux de hachage 137.0 GH/s Puissance 3 W Efficiency 18.3 J/TH
VS

MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+

Taux de hachage 416.0 TH/s Puissance 5,200 W Efficiency 12.5 J/TH

Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) Specification MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+
137.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 416.0 TH/s
3 W Consommation électrique 5,200 W
18.3 J/TH Efficiency 12.5 J/TH
Niveau de bruit 75 dB
Weight 18.0 kg
9 BTU/hr BTU Output 17,742 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Intel Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)

Daily Revenue 0.00000006 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.01
Daily Profit -$0.00
Monthly -$0.06
Yearly -$0.78

MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+

Daily Revenue 0.00018820 BTC $11.77
Daily Electricity -$12.48
Daily Profit -$0.71
Monthly -$21.37
Yearly -$260.01

Based on BTC price of $62,527 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 303550% more hashrate (0.1 vs 416.0 TH/s). That said, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) and MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ 303550% more hashrate (0.1 vs 416.0 TH/s)
  • Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 100% better power draw (2.5 vs 5,200.0 W)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ 32% better efficacité (18.3 vs 12.5 J/TH)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ 208634% more heat output (8.5 vs 17,742.4 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+

Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+

12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) or MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-0.71/day for the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) and MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+?

The Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) runs at 18.3 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ runs at 12.5 J/TH — a difference of 5.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 32% better efficacité (18.3 vs 12.5 J/TH).