NerdOctaxe Gamma vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| NerdOctaxe Gamma | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M3 |
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 200 W | Consommation électrique | 2,000 W |
| 25.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 166.7 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 0.8 kg | Weight | 8.1 kg |
| 682 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 61/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
NerdOctaxe Gamma
MicroBT Whatsminer M3
Based on BTC price of $62,527 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the NerdOctaxe Gamma, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 90% better power draw (200 vs 2,000 W) in the NerdOctaxe Gamma's favour. The MicroBT Whatsminer M3 holds the edge in hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the NerdOctaxe Gamma and MicroBT Whatsminer M3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3 50% more hashrate (8.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 90% better power draw (200 vs 2,000 W)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 85% better efficacité (25.0 vs 166.7 J/TH)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 90% better weight (0.8 vs 8.1 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3 900% more heat output (682 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 118% more score de minage domestique (61.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| NerdOctaxe Gamma | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M3 |
|---|---|---|
| $599 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$0.25 | Daily net profit | -$4.46 |
| -$692 | Net after 1 year | -$1,628 |
| -$784 | Net after 2 years | -$3,256 |
| -$877 | Net after 3 years | -$4,884 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
NerdOctaxe GammaScore: 61/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
NerdOctaxe Gamma25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the NerdOctaxe Gamma or MicroBT Whatsminer M3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdOctaxe Gamma is more profitable at $-0.25/day compared to $-4.46/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the NerdOctaxe Gamma or MicroBT Whatsminer M3?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma is quieter at 45 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the NerdOctaxe Gamma or the MicroBT Whatsminer M3?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
NerdOctaxe Gamma vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma runs at 25.0 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M3 runs at 166.7 J/TH — a difference of 141.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficacité (25.0 vs 166.7 J/TH).