Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

NerdQAxe

NerdQAxe

Taux de hachage 2.0 TH/s Puissance 80 W Efficiency 40.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Taux de hachage 24.0 TH/s Puissance 1,980 W Efficiency 82.5 J/TH

NerdQAxe vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

NerdQAxe Specification Innosilicon T2 Turbo
2.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 24.0 TH/s
80 W Consommation électrique 1,980 W
40.0 J/TH Efficiency 82.5 J/TH
40 dB Niveau de bruit
0.4 kg Weight 7.5 kg
273 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,756 BTU/hr
71/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

NerdQAxe

Daily Revenue 0.00000090 BTC $0.06
Daily Electricity -$0.19
Daily Profit -$0.14
Monthly -$4.05
Yearly -$49.33

Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Daily Revenue 0.00001086 BTC $0.68
Daily Electricity -$4.75
Daily Profit -$4.07
Monthly -$122.10
Yearly -$1,485.51

Based on BTC price of $62,822 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the NerdQAxe comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 96% better power draw (80.0 vs 1,980.0 W). That said, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: NerdQAxe — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the NerdQAxe and Innosilicon T2 Turbo actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo 1100% more hashrate (2.0 vs 24.0 TH/s)
  • NerdQAxe 96% better power draw (80.0 vs 1,980.0 W)
  • NerdQAxe 52% better efficacité (40.0 vs 82.5 J/TH)
  • NerdQAxe 95% better weight (0.4 vs 7.5 kg)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo 2375% more heat output (273 vs 6,756 BTU/hr)
  • NerdQAxe 154% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 28.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

NerdQAxe Metric Innosilicon T2 Turbo
$249 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$0.14 Daily net profit -$4.07
-$298 Net after 1 year -$1,486
-$348 Net after 2 years -$2,971
-$397 Net after 3 years -$4,457
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

NerdQAxe

Score: 71/100. 40 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

NerdQAxe

40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the NerdQAxe or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdQAxe is more profitable at $-0.14/day compared to $-4.07/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the NerdQAxe or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The NerdQAxe is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

NerdQAxe vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo: which fits a residential setup better?

The NerdQAxe scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

NerdQAxe vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The NerdQAxe runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo runs at 82.5 J/TH — a difference of 42.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 52% better efficacité (40.0 vs 82.5 J/TH).