Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)

Hashrate 750.0 MH/s Power 1,350 W Efficiency 1,800,000.0 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Mini

iPollo V1 Mini

Hashrate 300.0 MH/s Power 240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs iPollo V1 Mini

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) Specification iPollo V1 Mini
750.0 MH/s Hashrate 300.0 MH/s
1,350 W Power Consumption 240 W
1,800,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
Noise Level
8,100.0 kg Weight 2,100.0 kg
4,606 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
Innosilicon Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$3.24
Daily Profit -$3.24
Monthly -$97.20
Yearly -$1,182.59

iPollo V1 Mini

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.24

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the iPollo V1 Mini comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 3 (efficiency, power consumption, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 82% better power draw (1,350 vs 240 W). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iPollo V1 Mini — wins on 3 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) and iPollo V1 Mini diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 150% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Mini 82% better power draw (1,350 vs 240 W)
  • iPollo V1 Mini 56% better efficiency (1,800,000 vs 800,000 J/TH)
  • iPollo V1 Mini 74% better weight (8,100 vs 2,100 kg)
  • Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 462% more heat output (4,606 vs 819 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) Metric iPollo V1 Mini
$800 Upfront cost (MSRP) $300
-$3.24 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$1,983 Net after 1 year -$510
-$3,165 Net after 2 years -$720
-$4,348 Net after 3 years -$931
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V1 Mini

800,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or iPollo V1 Mini more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-3.24/day for the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or iPollo V1 Mini?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or iPollo V1 Mini?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs iPollo V1 Mini: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) runs at 1,800,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,000,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficiency (1,800,000 vs 800,000 J/TH).