Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Hashrate 1.5 GH/s Power 2,350 W Efficiency 1,566,666.7 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Hyd

iPollo V1 Hyd

Hashrate 900.0 MH/s Power 800 W Efficiency 888,888.9 J/TH

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs iPollo V1 Hyd

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) Specification iPollo V1 Hyd
1.5 GH/s Hashrate 900.0 MH/s
2,350 W Power Consumption 800 W
1,566,666.7 J/TH Efficiency 888,888.9 J/TH
Noise Level
Weight 8.0 kg
8,018 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,730 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
Innosilicon Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$5.64
Daily Profit -$5.64
Monthly -$169.20
Yearly -$2,058.58

iPollo V1 Hyd

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.92
Daily Profit -$1.92
Monthly -$57.60
Yearly -$700.79

Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the iPollo V1 Hyd edges it: 4 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 66% better power draw (2,350 vs 800 W). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iPollo V1 Hyd — wins on 4 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and iPollo V1 Hyd sit on each measurable spec:

  • Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 67% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Hyd 66% better power draw (2,350 vs 800 W)
  • iPollo V1 Hyd 43% better efficiency (1,566,667 vs 888,889 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 194% more heat output (8,018 vs 2,730 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V1 Hyd 15% more home mining score (26.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) Metric iPollo V1 Hyd
$1,200 Upfront cost (MSRP) $489
-$5.64 Daily net profit -$1.92
-$3,259 Net after 1 year -$1,190
-$5,317 Net after 2 years -$1,891
-$7,376 Net after 3 years -$2,591
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V1 Hyd

Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V1 Hyd

888,888.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs iPollo V1 Hyd: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Hyd is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or iPollo V1 Hyd?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs iPollo V1 Hyd: which fits a residential setup better?

The iPollo V1 Hyd scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and iPollo V1 Hyd?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Hyd runs at 888,888.9 J/TH — a difference of 677,777.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficiency (1,566,667 vs 888,889 J/TH).