Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell HS3-SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell HS3-SE |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Hashrate | 930.0 GH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 930 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,000.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 7,300.0 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,173 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell HS3-SE
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell HS3-SE comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 16908991% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.9 TH/s) in the Goldshell HS3-SE's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE Card isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell HS3-SE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell HS3-SE 16908991% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 93% better power draw (65.0 vs 930.0 W)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 1,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 100% better weight (0.3 vs 7,300.0 kg)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 1331% more heat output (222 vs 3,173 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 129% more home mining score (71.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell HS3-SE |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,700 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$2.20 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$2,503 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$3,305 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$4,108 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS3-SE1,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell HS3-SE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-2.20/day for the Goldshell HS3-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell HS3-SE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS3-SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell HS3-SE?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell HS3-SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell HS3-SE on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell HS3-SE runs at 1,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 11,817,181.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 1,000 J/TH).