Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS3-SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell HS3-SE |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 930.0 GH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 930 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,000.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 7,300.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,173 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell HS3-SE
Based on BTC price of $76,982 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell HS3-SE wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 1722122% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.9 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell HS3-SE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell HS3-SE 1722122% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 43% better power draw (530 vs 930 W)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 1,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 100% better weight (3.0 vs 7,300.0 kg)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 75% more heat output (1,808 vs 3,173 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 110% more home mining score (65.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell HS3-SE |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,700 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$2.20 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$2,503 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$3,305 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$4,108 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS3-SE1,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell HS3-SE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-2.20/day for the Goldshell HS3-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell HS3-SE?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS3-SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS3-SE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell HS3-SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell HS3-SE on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell HS3-SE runs at 1,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,813,814.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 1,000 J/TH).