Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS3-SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell HS3-SE |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 930.0 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 930 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,000.0 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 7,300.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,173 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell HS3-SE
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell HS3-SE edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,000 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell HS3-SE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell HS3-SE 172122% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 71% better power draw (3,200 vs 930 W)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 100% better weight (12.5 vs 7,300.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 244% more heat output (10,918 vs 3,173 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 7% more home mining score (29.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell HS3-SE |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,700 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$2.20 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$2,503 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$3,305 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$4,108 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS3-SEScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS3-SE1,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell HS3-SE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS3-SE is more profitable at $-2.20/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS3-SE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell HS3-SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS3-SE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell HS3-SE scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS3-SE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell HS3-SE runs at 1,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 5,924,925.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,000 J/TH).