Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS BOX II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell HS BOX II |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 460.0 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 869.6 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell HS BOX II
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell HS BOX II comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 870 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell HS BOX II diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell HS BOX II 85085% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 88% better power draw (3,200 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 870 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 84% better weight (12.5 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 700% more heat output (10,918 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 17% more home mining score (29.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell HS BOX II |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $325 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.94 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$670 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$1,014 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$1,359 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS BOX IIScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS BOX II869.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS BOX II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS BOX II is more profitable at $-0.94/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell HS BOX II?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell HS BOX II at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell HS BOX II?
The Goldshell HS BOX II scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS BOX II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell HS BOX II runs at 869.6 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,056.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 870 J/TH).