Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS BOX II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell HS BOX II |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 460.0 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 869.6 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell HS BOX II
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell HS BOX II edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 870 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max claws back ground on home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell HS BOX II diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell HS BOX II 127678% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 88% better power draw (3,300 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 870 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 85% better weight (13.5 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 725% more heat output (11,260 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 47% more home mining score (50.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell HS BOX II |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $325 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.94 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$670 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$1,014 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$1,359 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS BOX II869.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS BOX II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS BOX II is more profitable at $-0.94/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS BOX II: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell HS BOX II at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell HS BOX II?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell HS BOX II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS BOX II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell HS BOX II runs at 869.6 J/TH — a difference of 9,165,797.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 870 J/TH).