Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS BOX II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell HS BOX II |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 460.0 GH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 869.6 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell HS BOX II
Based on BTC price of $76,967 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell HS BOX II, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 870 J/TH). The Goldshell AE-BOX II claws back ground on home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell HS BOX II sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell HS BOX II 851752% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 25% better power draw (530 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 870 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 32% better weight (3.0 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 33% more heat output (1,808 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 91% more home mining score (65.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell HS BOX II |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $325 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$0.94 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$670 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$1,014 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$1,359 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS BOX II869.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS BOX II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS BOX II is more profitable at $-0.94/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS BOX II: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS BOX II at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell HS BOX II?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell HS BOX II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell HS BOX II?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell HS BOX II runs at 869.6 J/TH — a difference of 9,813,945.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 870 J/TH).