Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS1-PLUS
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell HS1-PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 105.0 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,095.2 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 450.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 392 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell HS1-PLUS
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell HS1-PLUS comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,095 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max II holds the edge in noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell HS1-PLUS diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 19344% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 96% better power draw (3,200 vs 115 W)
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,095 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 97% better weight (12.5 vs 450.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 2682% more heat output (10,918 vs 392 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 3% more home mining score (29.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell HS1-PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $900 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.27 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$999 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$1,099 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$1,198 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS1-PLUSScore: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS1-PLUS1,095.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS1-PLUS: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS1-PLUS is more profitable at $-0.27/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell HS1-PLUS better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell HS1-PLUS at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS1-PLUS: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell HS1-PLUS scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell HS1-PLUS on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell HS1-PLUS runs at 1,095.2 J/TH — a difference of 5,924,830.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,095 J/TH).