Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS1-PLUS
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell HS1-PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 105.0 GH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,095.2 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 450.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 392 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell HS1-PLUS
Based on BTC price of $77,152 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell HS1-PLUS edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 1,095 J/TH) in the Goldshell HS1-PLUS's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell HS1-PLUS actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 194344% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 78% better power draw (530 vs 115 W)
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 1,095 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 99% better weight (3.0 vs 450.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 361% more heat output (1,808 vs 392 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 117% more home mining score (65.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell HS1-PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $900 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$0.27 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$999 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$1,099 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$1,198 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS1-PLUS1,095.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS1-PLUS: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS1-PLUS is more profitable at $-0.27/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS1-PLUS: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS1-PLUS at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell HS1-PLUS?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Goldshell HS1-PLUS). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell HS1-PLUS?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell HS1-PLUS runs at 1,095.2 J/TH — a difference of 9,813,719.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 1,095 J/TH).