Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS1-PLUS
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell HS1-PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 105.0 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,095.2 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 450.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 392 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell HS1-PLUS
Based on BTC price of $76,882 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell HS1-PLUS, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 1,095 J/TH) in the Goldshell HS1-PLUS's favour. The Goldshell AE Max claws back ground on home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell HS1-PLUS sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 29067% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 97% better power draw (3,300 vs 115 W)
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 1,095 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 97% better weight (13.5 vs 450.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 2769% more heat output (11,260 vs 392 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 67% more home mining score (50.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell HS1-PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $900 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.27 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$999 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$1,099 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$1,198 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS1-PLUS1,095.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS1-PLUS: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS1-PLUS is more profitable at $-0.27/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell HS1-PLUS better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell HS1-PLUS at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell HS1-PLUS?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Goldshell HS1-PLUS). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell HS1-PLUS on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell HS1-PLUS runs at 1,095.2 J/TH — a difference of 9,165,571.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 1,095 J/TH).