Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell HS6 |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 4.3 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,250 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 755.8 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 8.5 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell HS6
Based on BTC price of $76,989 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell HS6, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 796196% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.3 TH/s). The Goldshell AE Max II claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell HS6 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell HS6 796196% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Max II 2% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,250 W)
- Goldshell HS6 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 756 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS6 32% better weight (12.5 vs 8.5 kg)
- Goldshell HS6 2% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 32% more home mining score (29.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell HS6 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,100 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$7.65 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$5,891 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$8,683 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$11,474 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS6755.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell HS6 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS6 is more profitable at $-7.65/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell HS6 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell HS6 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell HS6?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell HS6 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell HS6 runs at 755.8 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,170.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 756 J/TH).