Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell HS6 |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 4.3 TH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 3,250 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 755.8 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 8.5 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell HS6
Based on BTC price of $76,892 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell HS6 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 7962863% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.3 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell HS6 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell HS6 7962863% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 84% better power draw (530 vs 3,250 W)
- Goldshell HS6 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 756 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 65% better weight (3.0 vs 8.5 kg)
- Goldshell HS6 513% more heat output (1,808 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 195% more home mining score (65.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell HS6 |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,100 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$7.65 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$5,891 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$8,683 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$11,474 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS6755.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell HS6?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-7.65/day for the Goldshell HS6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS6: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS6 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell HS6?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS6: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell HS6 runs at 755.8 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,059.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 756 J/TH).