Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell HS6 |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 4.3 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 3,250 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 755.8 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 8.5 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell HS6
Based on BTC price of $76,989 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell HS6 edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 756 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell HS6 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell HS6 1194344% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS6 2% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,250 W)
- Goldshell HS6 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 756 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS6 37% better weight (13.5 vs 8.5 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 2% more heat output (11,260 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 127% more home mining score (50.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell HS6 |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,100 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$7.65 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$5,891 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$8,683 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$11,474 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS6755.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell HS6?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS6 is more profitable at $-7.65/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell HS6?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell HS6 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS6: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS6: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell HS6 runs at 755.8 J/TH — a difference of 9,165,910.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 756 J/TH).