Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell SC Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell SC Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 4.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 950 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 237.5 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 9.5 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,241 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell SC Lite
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell SC Lite wins on 5 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 238 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max II holds the edge in noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell SC Lite diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell SC Lite 740641% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC Lite 70% better power draw (3,200 vs 950 W)
- Goldshell SC Lite 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 238 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC Lite 24% better weight (12.5 vs 9.5 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 237% more heat output (10,918 vs 3,241 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell SC Lite 7% more home mining score (29.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell SC Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $130 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$2.14 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$911 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$1,691 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$2,472 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell SC LiteScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC Lite237.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell SC Lite?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC Lite is more profitable at $-2.14/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell SC Lite?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell SC Lite at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell SC Lite: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell SC Lite scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell SC Lite: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell SC Lite runs at 237.5 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,688.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 238 J/TH).