Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell SC Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell SC Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 4.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 950 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 237.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 9.5 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,241 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell SC Lite
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell SC Lite, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 238 J/TH) in the Goldshell SC Lite's favour. The Goldshell AE Max holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell SC Lite sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell SC Lite 1111011% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC Lite 71% better power draw (3,300 vs 950 W)
- Goldshell SC Lite 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 238 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC Lite 30% better weight (13.5 vs 9.5 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 247% more heat output (11,260 vs 3,241 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 61% more home mining score (50.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell SC Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $130 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$2.14 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$911 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$1,691 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$2,472 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC Lite237.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell SC Lite?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC Lite is more profitable at $-2.14/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell SC Lite: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell SC Lite at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell SC Lite?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell SC Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell SC Lite?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell SC Lite runs at 237.5 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,429.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 238 J/TH).