Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 14.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 235.7 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell SC5 Pro II
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell SC5 Pro II comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 2592493% more hashrate (0.0 vs 14.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell SC5 Pro II's favour. The Goldshell AE Max II claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell SC5 Pro II diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 2592493% more hashrate (0.0 vs 14.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Max II 3% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 236 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 8% better weight (12.5 vs 11.5 kg)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 3% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 32% more home mining score (29.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $630 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$7.42 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$3,340 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$6,050 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$8,760 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro II235.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC5 Pro II is more profitable at $-7.42/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell SC5 Pro II better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell SC5 Pro II at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell SC5 Pro II?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC5 Pro II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell SC5 Pro II?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro II runs at 235.7 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,690.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 236 J/TH).