Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 14.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 235.7 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell SC5 Pro II
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell SC5 Pro II comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 236 J/TH) in the Goldshell SC5 Pro II's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell SC5 Pro II diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 3888789% more hashrate (0.0 vs 14.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 236 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 15% better weight (13.5 vs 11.5 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 127% more home mining score (50.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $630 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$7.42 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$3,340 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$6,050 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$8,760 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro II235.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell SC5 Pro II more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC5 Pro II is more profitable at $-7.42/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell SC5 Pro II at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC5 Pro II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell SC5 Pro II on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro II runs at 235.7 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,431.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 236 J/TH).