Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 14.0 TH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 235.7 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell SC5 Pro II
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell SC5 Pro II, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 25925826% more hashrate (0.0 vs 14.0 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell SC5 Pro II actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 25925826% more hashrate (0.0 vs 14.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 84% better power draw (530 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 236 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 74% better weight (3.0 vs 11.5 kg)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 523% more heat output (1,808 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 195% more home mining score (65.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $630 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$7.42 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$3,340 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$6,050 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$8,760 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro II235.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-7.42/day for the Goldshell SC5 Pro II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell SC5 Pro II better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell SC5 Pro II at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell SC5 Pro II?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC5 Pro II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell SC5 Pro II?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro II runs at 235.7 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,579.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 236 J/TH).