Goldshell AE Max vs Iceriver AE2 720Mh
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Iceriver AE2 720Mh |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 720.0 MH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 1,300 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,805,555.6 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 60 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 15.5 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,436 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 80% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 1,805,556 J/TH) in the Iceriver AE2 720Mh's favour. The Goldshell AE Max claws back ground on noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Iceriver AE2 720Mh sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 100% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 61% better power draw (3,300 vs 1,300 W)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 80% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 1,805,556 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 8% better noise (55.0 vs 60.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE Max 13% better weight (13.5 vs 15.5 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 154% more heat output (11,260 vs 4,436 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 4% more home mining score (50.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Iceriver AE2 720Mh |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,595 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$3.12 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$2,734 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$3,873 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$5,011 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AE2 720MhScore: 52/100. 60 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AE2 720Mh1,805,555.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Iceriver AE2 720Mh?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max vs Iceriver AE2 720Mh: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Iceriver AE2 720Mh at 60 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max vs Iceriver AE2 720Mh: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max vs Iceriver AE2 720Mh: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH — a difference of 7,361,111.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 80% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 1,805,556 J/TH).