Goldshell AE Max vs Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 3,580 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,790,000.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,215 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Based on BTC price of $78,178 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Scored side by side, the Goldshell AE Max and Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 456% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Max 8% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,580 W)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 80% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 1,790,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 27% better noise (55.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE Max 10% better weight (13.5 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 8% more heat output (11,260 vs 12,215 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 67% more home mining score (50.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,390 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$8.59 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$8,526 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$11,662 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$14,798 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)1,790,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Max is more profitable at $-7.92/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max vs Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 7,376,666.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 80% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 1,790,000 J/TH).