Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS-LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell HS-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2,600.0 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 461.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 65 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 7.5 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | HNS & SC |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell HS-LITE
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell HS-LITE comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 462 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max holds the edge in noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell HS-LITE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell HS-LITE 722122% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS-LITE 64% better power draw (3,300 vs 1,200 W)
- Goldshell HS-LITE 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 462 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 15% better noise (55.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- Goldshell HS-LITE 44% better weight (13.5 vs 7.5 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 175% more heat output (11,260 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS-LITE 4% more home mining score (50.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell HS-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$2.79 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$1,517 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$2,534 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$3,552 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS-LITEScore: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS-LITE461.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell HS-LITE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS-LITE is more profitable at $-2.79/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS-LITE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell HS-LITE at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell HS-LITE?
The Goldshell HS-LITE scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS-LITE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell HS-LITE runs at 461.5 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,205.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 462 J/TH).