Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell HS-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 235.0 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 978.7 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 785 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell HS-BOX
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell HS-BOX, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 979 J/TH) in the Goldshell HS-BOX's favour. The Goldshell AE Max holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell HS-BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell HS-BOX 65178% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 93% better power draw (3,300 vs 230 W)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 979 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 1335% more heat output (11,260 vs 785 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 61% more home mining score (50.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell HS-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.54 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$297 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$496 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$694 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS-BOX978.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell HS-BOX?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS-BOX is more profitable at $-0.54/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell HS-BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell HS-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell HS-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell HS-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell HS-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell HS-BOX runs at 978.7 J/TH — a difference of 9,165,688.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 979 J/TH).