Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell HS-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 235.0 GH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 978.7 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 785 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell HS-BOX
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell HS-BOX comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 979 J/TH). The Goldshell AE-BOX II holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell HS-BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell HS-BOX 435085% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 57% better power draw (530 vs 230 W)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 979 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 130% more heat output (1,808 vs 785 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 110% more home mining score (65.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell HS-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$0.54 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$297 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$496 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$694 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS-BOX978.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell HS-BOX more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS-BOX is more profitable at $-0.54/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell HS-BOX?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell HS-BOX?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell HS-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell HS-BOX on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell HS-BOX runs at 978.7 J/TH — a difference of 9,813,836.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 979 J/TH).