Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) vs Goldshell AL MAX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) | Specification | Goldshell AL MAX |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 8.3 TH/s |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 3,350 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 403.6 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 614 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,430 BTU/hr |
| 33/100 | Home Mining Score | 50/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)
Goldshell AL MAX
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell AL MAX, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 2206% more hashrate (0.4 vs 8.3 TH/s). The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) and Goldshell AL MAX actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell AL MAX 2206% more hashrate (0.4 vs 8.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 95% better power draw (180 vs 3,350 W)
- Goldshell AL MAX 19% better efficiency (500 vs 404 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 84% better weight (2.2 vs 13.5 kg)
- Goldshell AL MAX 1761% more heat output (614 vs 11,430 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AL MAX 52% more home mining score (33.0 vs 50.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) | Metric | Goldshell AL MAX |
|---|---|---|
| $340 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,370 |
| -$0.42 | Daily net profit | -$7.74 |
| -$493 | Net after 1 year | -$5,195 |
| -$646 | Net after 2 years | -$8,021 |
| -$799 | Net after 3 years | -$10,846 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AL MAXScore: 50/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL MAX403.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or the Goldshell AL MAX?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) is more profitable at $-0.42/day compared to $-7.74/day for the Goldshell AL MAX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or the Goldshell AL MAX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AL MAX is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or Goldshell AL MAX?
The Goldshell AL MAX scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) and Goldshell AL MAX?
The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) runs at 500.0 J/TH while the Goldshell AL MAX runs at 403.6 J/TH — a difference of 96.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 19% better efficiency (500 vs 404 J/TH).