Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus vs Goldshell AL BOX III
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus | Specification | Goldshell AL BOX III |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.3 TH/s |
| 480 W | Power Consumption | 600 W |
| 480.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 480.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 1,638 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus
Goldshell AL BOX III
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Scored side by side, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus and Goldshell AL BOX III trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus and Goldshell AL BOX III actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell AL BOX III 25% more hashrate (1.0 vs 1.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 20% better power draw (480 vs 600 W)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 25% more heat output (1,638 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 13% more home mining score (34.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus | Metric | Goldshell AL BOX III |
|---|---|---|
| $129 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $139 |
| -$1.12 | Daily net profit | -$1.39 |
| -$536 | Net after 1 year | -$648 |
| -$944 | Net after 2 years | -$1,157 |
| -$1,351 | Net after 3 years | -$1,667 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AL-BOX II PlusScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
TieBoth miners have comparable efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or the Goldshell AL BOX III?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus is more profitable at $-1.12/day compared to $-1.39/day for the Goldshell AL BOX III. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or the Goldshell AL BOX III better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or the Goldshell AL BOX III?
The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX III). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus and Goldshell AL BOX III?
The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus runs at 480.0 J/TH while the Goldshell AL BOX III runs at 480.0 J/TH — a difference of 0.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.