Iceriver AL3 vs Goldshell E-AL1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | Goldshell E-AL1M |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 4.4 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 1,800 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 409.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
Goldshell E-AL1M
Based on BTC price of $78,183 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Iceriver AL3 wins on 5 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 241% more hashrate (15.0 vs 4.4 TH/s) in the Iceriver AL3's favour. The Goldshell E-AL1M holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver AL3 and Goldshell E-AL1M diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver AL3 241% more hashrate (15.0 vs 4.4 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 49% better power draw (3,500 vs 1,800 W)
- Iceriver AL3 43% better efficiency (233 vs 409 J/TH)
- Iceriver AL3 94% more heat output (11,942 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AL3 29% more home mining score (36.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | Goldshell E-AL1M |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$4.16 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$2,318 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$3,837 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$5,356 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AL3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver AL3 or the Goldshell E-AL1M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-AL1M is more profitable at $-4.16/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver AL3 vs Goldshell E-AL1M: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver AL3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell E-AL1M at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver AL3 vs Goldshell E-AL1M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver AL3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell E-AL1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver AL3 and Goldshell E-AL1M on J/TH?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the Goldshell E-AL1M runs at 409.1 J/TH — a difference of 175.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficiency (233 vs 409 J/TH).