Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 166.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Power Consumption | 3,154 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 19.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 16,100.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,761 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,221 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 91% better efficiency (210.0 vs 19.0 J/TH). The Antminer AL1 holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) 938% more hashrate (16.0 vs 166.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) 6% better power draw (3,360 vs 3,154 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) 91% better efficiency (210.0 vs 19.0 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 100% better weight (14.5 vs 16,100.0 kg)
- Antminer AL1 7% more heat output (11,464 vs 10,761 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 64% more home mining score (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,399 |
| -$7.49 | Daily net profit | -$1.59 |
| -$12,733 | Net after 1 year | -$1,981 |
| -$15,466 | Net after 2 years | -$2,563 |
| -$18,199 | Net after 3 years | -$3,145 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th)19.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) is more profitable at $-1.59/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th)?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th)?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th)?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) runs at 19.0 J/TH — a difference of 191.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 91% better efficiency (210.0 vs 19.0 J/TH).