Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) vs Baikal Giant A900
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) | Specification | Baikal Giant A900 |
|---|---|---|
| 119.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 900.0 MH/s |
| 1,566 W | Power Consumption | 270 W |
| 13,159.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 7,500.0 kg | Weight | 2,550.0 kg |
| 5,343 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 921 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithm | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh)
Baikal Giant A900
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 13122% more hashrate (0.1 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh)'s favour. That said, the Baikal Giant A900 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) and Baikal Giant A900 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) 13122% more hashrate (0.1 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Giant A900 83% better power draw (1,566 vs 270 W)
- Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) 96% better efficiency (13,160 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- Baikal Giant A900 66% better weight (7,500 vs 2,550 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) 480% more heat output (5,343 vs 921 BTU/hr)
- Baikal Giant A900 11% more home mining score (28.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) | Metric | Baikal Giant A900 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,499 |
| -$3.75 | Daily net profit | -$0.65 |
| -$1,370 | Net after 1 year | -$2,735 |
| -$2,741 | Net after 2 years | -$2,972 |
| -$4,111 | Net after 3 years | -$3,209 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal Giant A900Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh)13,159.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) or Baikal Giant A900 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Giant A900 is more profitable at $-0.65/day compared to $-3.75/day for the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) or Baikal Giant A900?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) or the Baikal Giant A900?
The Baikal Giant A900 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) and Baikal Giant A900 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) runs at 13,159.7 J/TH while the Baikal Giant A900 runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 286,840.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 96% better efficiency (13,160 vs 300,000 J/TH).