Antminer D9 vs Baikal Miner Cube
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 300.0 MH/s |
| 2,839 W | Power Consumption | 90 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | — |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 307 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithm | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Baikal Miner Cube
Based on BTC price of $77,962 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer D9 edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 589900% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Antminer D9's favour. The Baikal Miner Cube claws back ground on power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer D9 and Baikal Miner Cube diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer D9 589900% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Miner Cube 97% better power draw (2,839.0 vs 90.0 W)
- Antminer D9 99% better efficiency (1,604 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- Antminer D9 3054% more heat output (9,687 vs 307 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,000 |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$0.22 |
| -$5,464 | Net after 1 year | -$1,079 |
| -$7,928 | Net after 2 years | -$1,158 |
| -$10,391 | Net after 3 years | -$1,236 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer D91,604.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer D9 vs Baikal Miner Cube: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Miner Cube is more profitable at $-0.22/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer D9 or the Baikal Miner Cube better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer D9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Baikal Miner Cube at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer D9 or the Baikal Miner Cube?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Antminer D9 vs Baikal Miner Cube: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Baikal Miner Cube runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 298,396.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (1,604 vs 300,000 J/TH).