Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs Jasminer X44-P
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) | Specification | Jasminer X44-P |
|---|---|---|
| 9.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 23.4 GH/s |
| 2,340 W | Power Consumption | 2,550 W |
| 260,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 108,974.4 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 80 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 15.7 kg |
| 7,984 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,701 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 29/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)
Jasminer X44-P
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X44-P comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 160% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) and Jasminer X44-P sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X44-P 160% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 8% better power draw (2,340 vs 2,550 W)
- Jasminer X44-P 58% better efficiency (260,000 vs 108,974 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 6% better noise (75.0 vs 80.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 10% better weight (14.2 vs 15.7 kg)
- Jasminer X44-P 9% more heat output (7,984 vs 8,701 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 38% more home mining score (40.0 vs 29.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) | Metric | Jasminer X44-P |
|---|---|---|
| $5,399 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,580 |
| -$5.62 | Daily net profit | -$6.12 |
| -$7,449 | Net after 1 year | -$7,813 |
| -$9,498 | Net after 2 years | -$10,047 |
| -$11,548 | Net after 3 years | -$12,280 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)Score: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X44-P108,974.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) or Jasminer X44-P more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) is more profitable at $-5.62/day compared to $-6.12/day for the Jasminer X44-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs Jasminer X44-P: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Jasminer X44-P at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs Jasminer X44-P: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Jasminer X44-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) and Jasminer X44-P?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) runs at 260,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X44-P runs at 108,974.4 J/TH — a difference of 151,025.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 58% better efficiency (260,000 vs 108,974 J/TH).