Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) | Specification | iPollo V2 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 GH/s | Hashrate | 10.0 GH/s |
| 2,556 W | Power Consumption | 1,500 W |
| 1,065,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 150,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 16.5 kg |
| 8,721 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,118 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 48/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)
iPollo V2
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iPollo V2 wins on 5 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 86% better efficiency (1,065,000 vs 150,000 J/TH) in the iPollo V2's favour. The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) claws back ground on price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) and iPollo V2 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iPollo V2 317% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V2 41% better power draw (2,556 vs 1,500 W)
- iPollo V2 86% better efficiency (1,065,000 vs 150,000 J/TH)
- iPollo V2 100% better weight (14,200.0 vs 16.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) 70% more heat output (8,721 vs 5,118 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V2 118% more home mining score (22.0 vs 48.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) | Metric | iPollo V2 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,140 |
| -$6.13 | Daily net profit | -$3.60 |
| -$3,239 | Net after 1 year | -$6,454 |
| -$5,478 | Net after 2 years | -$7,768 |
| -$7,717 | Net after 3 years | -$9,082 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V2Score: 48/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2150,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V2: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2 is more profitable at $-3.60/day compared to $-6.13/day for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) or the iPollo V2 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iPollo V2 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V2: which fits a residential setup better?
The iPollo V2 scores 48/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) and iPollo V2?
The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) runs at 1,065,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V2 runs at 150,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 915,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficiency (1,065,000 vs 150,000 J/TH).