Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer HS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 9.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Power Consumption | 2,079 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 231.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 16,100.0 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,094 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Bitmain Antminer HS3
Based on BTC price of $76,769 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer HS3 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (597,826 vs 231 J/TH). That said, the Antminer E9 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer HS3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 244465% more hashrate (0.0 vs 9.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 6% better power draw (2,200 vs 2,079 W)
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 100% better efficiency (597,826 vs 231 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 100% better weight (14.2 vs 16,100.0 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 6% more heat output (7,506 vs 7,094 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 54% more home mining score (40.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $900 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$4.67 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$2,605 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$4,310 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$6,015 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer HS3231.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer HS3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer HS3 is more profitable at $-4.67/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or the Bitmain Antminer HS3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer HS3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer HS3: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer HS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer HS3?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer HS3 runs at 231.0 J/TH — a difference of 597,595.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (597,826 vs 231 J/TH).