Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer HS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 9.0 TH/s |
| 2,839 W | Power Consumption | 2,079 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 231.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 16,100.0 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,094 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Bitmain Antminer HS3
Based on BTC price of $76,769 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer HS3 edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 86% better efficiency (1,604 vs 231 J/TH). The Antminer D9 claws back ground on home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer HS3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 408% more hashrate (1.8 vs 9.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 27% better power draw (2,839 vs 2,079 W)
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 86% better efficiency (1,604 vs 231 J/TH)
- Antminer D9 100% better weight (16.1 vs 16,100.0 kg)
- Antminer D9 37% more heat output (9,687 vs 7,094 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D9 38% more home mining score (36.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $900 |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$4.67 |
| -$5,464 | Net after 1 year | -$2,605 |
| -$7,928 | Net after 2 years | -$4,310 |
| -$10,392 | Net after 3 years | -$6,015 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D9Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer HS3231.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain Antminer HS3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer HS3 is more profitable at $-4.67/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer HS3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer D9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer HS3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer HS3: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer D9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer HS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer HS3 on J/TH?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer HS3 runs at 231.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,373.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficiency (1,604 vs 231 J/TH).