Antminer KS3 vs Iceriver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS3 | Specification | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 3,200 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS3
Iceriver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer KS3 wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 18% more hashrate (9.4 vs 8.0 TH/s). The Iceriver KS3 holds the edge in power consumption and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer KS3 and Iceriver KS3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer KS3 18% more hashrate (9.4 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS3 9% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,200 W)
- Antminer KS3 7% better efficiency (372 vs 400 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS3 16% better weight (16.1 vs 13.5 kg)
- Antminer KS3 9% more heat output (11,942 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer KS3 | Metric | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $8,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $730 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$10,943 | Net after 1 year | -$3,428 |
| -$13,885 | Net after 2 years | -$6,126 |
| -$16,828 | Net after 3 years | -$8,825 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer KS3372.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer KS3 or Iceriver KS3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS3 is more profitable at $-7.39/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Antminer KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer KS3 or the Iceriver KS3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer KS3 or the Iceriver KS3?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer KS3 and Iceriver KS3?
The Antminer KS3 runs at 372.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 27.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficiency (372 vs 400 J/TH).