Antminer KS5 vs Goldshell E-KA1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS5 | Specification | Goldshell E-KA1M |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 5.5 TH/s |
| 3,000 W | Power Consumption | 1,800 W |
| 150.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 327.3 J/TH |
| 76 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 15.8 kg | Weight | — |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS5
Goldshell E-KA1M
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Scored side by side, the Antminer KS5 and Goldshell E-KA1M trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer KS5 and Goldshell E-KA1M sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer KS5 264% more hashrate (20.0 vs 5.5 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 40% better power draw (3,000 vs 1,800 W)
- Antminer KS5 54% better efficiency (150 vs 327 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 34% better noise (76.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Antminer KS5 67% more heat output (10,236 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 93% more home mining score (29.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer KS5 | Metric | Goldshell E-KA1M |
|---|---|---|
| $12,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $910 |
| -$6.48 | Daily net profit | -$4.12 |
| -$14,365 | Net after 1 year | -$2,415 |
| -$16,730 | Net after 2 years | -$3,919 |
| -$19,096 | Net after 3 years | -$5,424 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-KA1MScore: 56/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer KS5150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer KS5 or the Goldshell E-KA1M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-KA1M is more profitable at $-4.12/day compared to $-6.48/day for the Antminer KS5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer KS5 or Goldshell E-KA1M?
The Goldshell E-KA1M is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer KS5 at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer KS5 vs Goldshell E-KA1M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell E-KA1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Antminer KS5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer KS5 vs Goldshell E-KA1M: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer KS5 runs at 150.0 J/TH while the Goldshell E-KA1M runs at 327.3 J/TH — a difference of 177.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 54% better efficiency (150 vs 327 J/TH).