Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer KS5

Antminer KS5

Hashrate 20.0 TH/s Power 3,000 W Efficiency 150.0 J/TH
VS
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE

Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE

Hashrate 2.0 TH/s Power 500 W Efficiency 250.0 J/TH

Antminer KS5 vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer KS5 Specification Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
20.0 TH/s Hashrate 2.0 TH/s
3,000 W Power Consumption 500 W
150.0 J/TH Efficiency 250.0 J/TH
76 dB Noise Level 45 dB
15.8 kg Weight 5.0 kg
10,236 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,706 BTU/hr
29/100 Home Mining Score 62/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithm KHeavyHash
Bitmain Manufacturer IceRiver

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer KS5

Daily Revenue 0.00000920 BTC $0.72
Daily Electricity -$7.20
Daily Profit -$6.48
Monthly -$194.40
Yearly -$2,365.19

Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE

Daily Revenue 0.00000092 BTC $0.07
Daily Electricity -$1.20
Daily Profit -$1.13
Monthly -$33.84
Yearly -$411.72

Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Both the Antminer KS5 and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE are closely matched across our scoring factors, with neither holding a decisive advantage. Your choice should depend on your specific priorities — review the specs and profitability analysis above.

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer KS5 and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Antminer KS5 900% more hashrate (20.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
  • Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 83% better power draw (3,000 vs 500 W)
  • Antminer KS5 40% better efficiency (150 vs 250 J/TH)
  • Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 41% better noise (76.0 vs 45.0 dB)
  • Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 68% better weight (15.8 vs 5.0 kg)
  • Antminer KS5 500% more heat output (10,236 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
  • Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 114% more home mining score (29.0 vs 62.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer KS5 Metric Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
$12,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $458
-$6.48 Daily net profit -$1.13
-$14,365 Net after 1 year -$870
-$16,730 Net after 2 years -$1,281
-$19,096 Net after 3 years -$1,693
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE

Score: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer KS5

150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Antminer KS5 vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is more profitable at $-1.13/day compared to $-6.48/day for the Antminer KS5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer KS5 or the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Antminer KS5 at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer KS5 or Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?

The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Antminer KS5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Antminer KS5 and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE on J/TH?

The Antminer KS5 runs at 150.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 100.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 40% better efficiency (150 vs 250 J/TH).