Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer U2L9H
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer U2L9H |
|---|---|---|
| 580.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 27.0 GH/s |
| 942 W | Power Consumption | 5,670 W |
| 1,624,137.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 210,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | 19.1 kg |
| 3,214 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 19,346 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Bitmain Antminer U2L9H
Based on BTC price of $78,158 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer U2L9H wins on 5 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 4555% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer U2L9H's favour. That said, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and Bitmain Antminer U2L9H sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer U2L9H 4555% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 83% better power draw (942 vs 5,670 W)
- Bitmain Antminer U2L9H 87% better efficiency (1,624,138 vs 210,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer U2L9H 100% better weight (4,400.0 vs 19.1 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer U2L9H 502% more heat output (3,214 vs 19,346 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer U2L9H 42% more home mining score (31.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer U2L9H |
|---|---|---|
| $1,190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,998 |
| -$2.26 | Daily net profit | -$13.61 |
| -$2,015 | Net after 1 year | -$8,965 |
| -$2,840 | Net after 2 years | -$13,931 |
| -$3,666 | Net after 3 years | -$18,898 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer U2L9HScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer U2L9H210,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or Bitmain Antminer U2L9H more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) is more profitable at $-2.26/day compared to $-13.61/day for the Bitmain Antminer U2L9H. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or Bitmain Antminer U2L9H?
The Bitmain Antminer U2L9H is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer U2L9H: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer U2L9H scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and Bitmain Antminer U2L9H on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) runs at 1,624,137.9 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer U2L9H runs at 210,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,414,137.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficiency (1,624,138 vs 210,000 J/TH).