Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer L3+

Antminer L3+

Hashrate 504.0 MH/s Power 800 W Efficiency 1,587,301.6 J/TH
VS
VOLCMINER D3

VOLCMINER D3

Hashrate 20.0 GH/s Power 3,580 W Efficiency 179,000.0 J/TH

Antminer L3+ vs VOLCMINER D3

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer L3+ Specification VOLCMINER D3
504.0 MH/s Hashrate 20.0 GH/s
800 W Power Consumption 3,580 W
1,587,301.6 J/TH Efficiency 179,000.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
5.5 kg Weight 22.0 kg
2,730 BTU/hr BTU Output 12,215 BTU/hr
82/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithm Scrypt
Bitmain Manufacturer VOLCMINER

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer L3+

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.92
Daily Profit -$1.92
Monthly -$57.60
Yearly -$700.79

VOLCMINER D3

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$8.59
Daily Profit -$8.59
Monthly -$257.74
Yearly -$3,135.82

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the VOLCMINER D3 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 3868% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the VOLCMINER D3's favour. That said, the Antminer L3+ isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: VOLCMINER D3 — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer L3+ and VOLCMINER D3 sit on each measurable spec:

  • VOLCMINER D3 3868% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer L3+ 78% better power draw (800 vs 3,580 W)
  • VOLCMINER D3 89% better efficiency (1,587,302 vs 179,000 J/TH)
  • Antminer L3+ 75% better weight (5.5 vs 22.0 kg)
  • VOLCMINER D3 348% more heat output (2,730 vs 12,215 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer L3+ 173% more home mining score (82.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer L3+ Metric VOLCMINER D3
Upfront cost (MSRP) $5,990
-$1.92 Daily net profit -$8.59
-$701 Net after 1 year -$9,126
-$1,402 Net after 2 years -$12,262
-$2,102 Net after 3 years -$15,397
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer L3+

Score: 82/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

VOLCMINER D3

179,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Antminer L3+ vs VOLCMINER D3: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer L3+ is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-8.59/day for the VOLCMINER D3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer L3+ or VOLCMINER D3?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Antminer L3+ vs VOLCMINER D3: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer L3+ scores 82/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the VOLCMINER D3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Antminer L3+ and VOLCMINER D3 on J/TH?

The Antminer L3+ runs at 1,587,301.6 J/TH while the VOLCMINER D3 runs at 179,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,408,301.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 89% better efficiency (1,587,302 vs 179,000 J/TH).