Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer L3+

Antminer L3+

Hashrate 504.0 MH/s Power 800 W Efficiency 1,587,301.6 J/TH
VS
Elphapex DG1+

Elphapex DG1+

Hashrate 14,400.0 MH/s Power 3,920 W Efficiency 272,222.2 J/TH

Antminer L3+ vs Elphapex DG1+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer L3+ Specification Elphapex DG1+
504.0 MH/s Hashrate 14,400.0 MH/s
800 W Power Consumption 3,920 W
1,587,301.6 J/TH Efficiency 272,222.2 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
5.5 kg Weight 18.3 kg
2,730 BTU/hr BTU Output 13,375 BTU/hr
82/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithm Scrypt
Bitmain Manufacturer Elphapex

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer L3+

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.92
Daily Profit -$1.92
Monthly -$57.60
Yearly -$700.79

Elphapex DG1+

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$9.41
Daily Profit -$9.41
Monthly -$282.22
Yearly -$3,433.73

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Elphapex DG1+ edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 2757% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Elphapex DG1+'s favour. The Antminer L3+ holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Elphapex DG1+ — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer L3+ and Elphapex DG1+ actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Elphapex DG1+ 2757% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer L3+ 80% better power draw (800 vs 3,920 W)
  • Elphapex DG1+ 83% better efficiency (1,587,302 vs 272,222 J/TH)
  • Antminer L3+ 70% better weight (5.5 vs 18.3 kg)
  • Elphapex DG1+ 390% more heat output (2,730 vs 13,375 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer L3+ 173% more home mining score (82.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Antminer L3+ Metric Elphapex DG1+
Upfront cost (MSRP) $8,500
-$1.92 Daily net profit -$9.41
-$701 Net after 1 year -$11,934
-$1,402 Net after 2 years -$15,367
-$2,102 Net after 3 years -$18,801
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer L3+

Score: 82/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Elphapex DG1+

272,222.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer L3+ or the Elphapex DG1+?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer L3+ is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-9.41/day for the Elphapex DG1+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer L3+ or Elphapex DG1+?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer L3+ or Elphapex DG1+?

The Antminer L3+ scores 82/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Elphapex DG1+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer L3+ and Elphapex DG1+?

The Antminer L3+ runs at 1,587,301.6 J/TH while the Elphapex DG1+ runs at 272,222.2 J/TH — a difference of 1,315,079.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 83% better efficiency (1,587,302 vs 272,222 J/TH).