Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) vs Elphapex DG Hydro 1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) | Specification | Elphapex DG Hydro 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 9.1 GH/s | Hashrate | 20.0 GH/s |
| 3,260 W | Power Consumption | 6,200 W |
| 360,221.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 310,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 13,500.0 kg | Weight | 25.0 kg |
| 11,123 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 21,154 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Elphapex |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh)
Elphapex DG Hydro 1
Based on BTC price of $78,158 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Elphapex DG Hydro 1 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 121% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) and Elphapex DG Hydro 1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Elphapex DG Hydro 1 121% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) 47% better power draw (3,260 vs 6,200 W)
- Elphapex DG Hydro 1 14% better efficiency (360,221 vs 310,000 J/TH)
- Elphapex DG Hydro 1 100% better weight (13,500.0 vs 25.0 kg)
- Elphapex DG Hydro 1 90% more heat output (11,123 vs 21,154 BTU/hr)
- Elphapex DG Hydro 1 100% more home mining score (22.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) | Metric | Elphapex DG Hydro 1 |
|---|---|---|
| $750 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,459 |
| -$7.82 | Daily net profit | -$14.88 |
| -$3,606 | Net after 1 year | -$9,890 |
| -$6,461 | Net after 2 years | -$15,321 |
| -$9,317 | Net after 3 years | -$20,752 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Elphapex DG Hydro 1Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Elphapex DG Hydro 1310,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) or Elphapex DG Hydro 1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) is more profitable at $-7.82/day compared to $-14.88/day for the Elphapex DG Hydro 1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) vs Elphapex DG Hydro 1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Elphapex DG Hydro 1 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) or the Elphapex DG Hydro 1?
The Elphapex DG Hydro 1 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) and Elphapex DG Hydro 1?
The Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) runs at 360,221.0 J/TH while the Elphapex DG Hydro 1 runs at 310,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 50,221.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 14% better efficiency (360,221 vs 310,000 J/TH).