Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 9.1 GH/s |
| 3,360 W | Power Consumption | 3,260 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 360,221.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 13,500.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,123 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,158 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer AL1, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 176696% more hashrate (16.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer AL1 176696% more hashrate (16.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) 3% better power draw (3,360 vs 3,260 W)
- Antminer AL1 100% better efficiency (210 vs 360,221 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 100% better weight (14.5 vs 13,500.0 kg)
- Antminer AL1 3% more heat output (11,464 vs 11,123 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 64% more home mining score (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $750 |
| -$7.49 | Daily net profit | -$7.82 |
| -$12,733 | Net after 1 year | -$3,606 |
| -$15,467 | Net after 2 years | -$6,461 |
| -$18,200 | Net after 3 years | -$9,317 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer AL1210.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer AL1 is more profitable at $-7.49/day compared to $-7.82/day for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh)?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh)?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) runs at 360,221.0 J/TH — a difference of 360,011.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (210 vs 360,221 J/TH).