Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs StrongU STU-U8
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | StrongU STU-U8 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 46.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 2,100 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.7 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 8,200.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,165 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | StrongU |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
StrongU STU-U8
Based on BTC price of $78,265 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the StrongU STU-U8 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 229% more hashrate (14.0 vs 46.0 TH/s). That said, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and StrongU STU-U8 sit on each measurable spec:
- StrongU STU-U8 229% more hashrate (14.0 vs 46.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 36% better power draw (1,350 vs 2,100 W)
- StrongU STU-U8 53% better efficiency (96.4 vs 45.7 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 100% better weight (6.0 vs 8,200.0 kg)
- StrongU STU-U8 56% more heat output (4,606 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 127% more home mining score (59.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | StrongU STU-U8 |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$3.38 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$1,235 |
| -$2,346 | Net after 2 years | -$2,470 |
| -$3,345 | Net after 3 years | -$3,705 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
StrongU STU-U845.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the StrongU STU-U8?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.74/day compared to $-3.38/day for the StrongU STU-U8. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs StrongU STU-U8: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the StrongU STU-U8 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or StrongU STU-U8?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the StrongU STU-U8). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs StrongU STU-U8: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the StrongU STU-U8 runs at 45.7 J/TH — a difference of 50.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficiency (96.4 vs 45.7 J/TH).